|
|
Post by Farmduck on Dec 30, 2013 18:04:19 GMT 10
No offence to all the blind people reading this but, blind cricket! I can't understand why they all appeal for every LBW. How do they know?
|
|
|
|
Post by stonedrose on Dec 30, 2013 18:17:02 GMT 10
Mmmmmm, just a coincidence you happen to start a "blind cricket" thread as the Aussies are beating England 4-0 in the ashes.
If so, fair play to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Farmduck on Dec 30, 2013 18:20:25 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by queso on Dec 30, 2013 20:56:54 GMT 10
of course, there is "blind" and "blind"
|
|
|
|
Post by stonedrose on Dec 30, 2013 23:31:13 GMT 10
Let's not forget totally and utterly blind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Farmduck on Dec 31, 2013 0:07:37 GMT 10
Or "snowblind," "colourblind," "blind drunk," "venetian blinds," double-blinds," and "blind as a bat"
|
|
|
|
Post by queso on Dec 31, 2013 1:20:45 GMT 10
no need to be blind to be registered blind.
|
|
|
|
Post by Farmduck on Dec 31, 2013 5:51:25 GMT 10
From watching that clip it hardly seems fair. A legally blind bowler bowling at a totally blind batsmen hardly seems fair. Also, since they use a soft ball and bowl underarm, why does the wicketkeeper need gloves? Also the traditional umpiring "out" signal seems a bit rude when the batsman is blind.
|
|
